garmin vivosport vs vivosmart 4vs samsung galaxy fit

Garmin Vivosport vs Vivosmart 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit – Which Should You Buy?

Like this post? Please share it...

Last Updated on

Featured in this comparison are; the Galaxy fit form Samsung – A low price smartband with some very interesting features, also joined by the duo; Garmin Vivosport and Vivosmart 4 – two other outstanding smartbands and some of the best selling on the market.

One common thing among these three is the about $100 price tag on each which makes it a very interesting comparison. Head-to-head we compare the specs and features the Vivosport vs Vivosmart 4 vs Galaxy Fit, so you know what the differences are and which of these three is the ideal choice for you.

Garmin Vivosport vs Vivosmart 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit Specs Compared

 Garmin VivosportGarmin Vivosmart 4Samsung Galaxy Fit
garmin vivosport specsgarmin vivosmart 4 specssamsung galaxy fit specs

EDITOR'S RATING

Design:
3.6 out of 5 stars (3.6 / 5)
Battery:
4.4 out of 5 stars (4.4 / 5)
Fitness tracking:
4 out of 5 stars (4.0 / 5)
Features:
3.4 out of 5 stars (3.4 / 5)
Price:
4.3 out of 5 stars (4.3 / 5)
Average:
3.9 out of 5 stars (3.9 / 5)
Design:
3.8 out of 5 stars (3.8 / 5)
Battery:
4.4 out of 5 stars (4.4 / 5)
Fitness tracking:
4 out of 5 stars (4.0 / 5)
Features:
3.4 out of 5 stars (3.4 / 5)
Price:
4.3 out of 5 stars (4.3 / 5)
Average:
4 out of 5 stars (4.0 / 5)
Design:
4.5 out of 5 stars (4.5 / 5)
Battery:
4.3 out of 5 stars (4.3 / 5)
Fitness tracking:
4.3 out of 5 stars (4.3 / 5)
Features:
3.6 out of 5 stars (3.6 / 5)
Price:
4 out of 5 stars (4.0 / 5)
Average:
4.1 out of 5 stars (4.1 / 5)

WHERE TO BUY

<strong>View @ Amazon</strong> View @ Amazon<strong>Check at Amazon</strong> Check at Amazon<strong>Check at Amazon</strong> Check at Amazon

ABOUT DEVICE

Device nameGarmin VivosportGarmin VivosmartSamsung Galaxy Fit
(SM-R370)
Device typeFitness SmartbandFitness SmartbandFitness smartband
Predessesor__Garmin Vivosmart 3__
Successor______
Released dateAugust, 2017August, 2018February, 2019
Ideal forUnisexUnisexUnisex

DISPLAY

Display typeTransflective memory-in-display (MIP)OLEDAMOLED
Display size0.85 inch0.75 inch0.95 inch
Display resolution72 x 144 pixels48 x 128 pixels120 x 240 pixel
Pixel density----__
Input typeTouchscreenTouchscreenTouchscreen
1 single button
Always-onYesYesYes

BODY

ShapeRectangular/curvedRectangular/curvedRectangular/curved
Dimension32 x 21 x 10.9 mm__44.6 x 18.3 x 11.2 mm
Weight24.1 g (small band)
27 g (large band)
16.5 g (small band)
17.1 g (large band)
23 grams
(without straps)
Casing materialPolycarbonatePolycarbonateAluminum
Strap/band materialSiliconeSiliconeSilicone
Bezel Material_AluminumAluminum
Strap size122-188 mm (Small)
148-215 mm (large)
122-188 mm (Small)
148-215 mm (large)
20mm
Screen protectionChemically strengthened glassChemically strengthened glassCorning Gorilla glass
Water resistant/ProtectionYes, 5ATMYes, 5ATMYes, 5ATM
(MIL-STD-810G)
Swim-proofYes, recommendedYes, recommendedYes, recommended
Color(s)Slate, limelightGold/berry, Gold/gray. Silver/blue
Black
Black
White

MEMORY

RAM----2MB
Internal storage14 days of activity tracking data14 days of activity tracking data32MB
Memory card slotNoNoNo

CONNECTIVITY

BluetoothBluetooth and ANT+Bluetooth and ANT+Bluetooth v5.0 LE
Bluetooth callingNoNoNo
Wi-FiNoNoNo
NFCNoNoYes
(Support charging dock)
GPSYesNo (connected GPS)No

CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY

TechnologyNoNoNo
SIMNoNoNo
BandNoNoNo

NOTIFICATIONS

Email alertYesYesYes
SMS alertYesYesYes
Calls alertYesYesYes
Event reminderYesYesYes
WeatherYesYesYes
Third-party appsYesYesYes

FITNESS TRACKING

Sleep apneaNoNoNo
Sleep trackingYesYesYes
StepsYesYesYes
Floors climbedYesYesNo
Heart rate monitoringYesYesYes
CaloriesYesYesYes
DistanceYesYesYes
StressYesYesNo
VO2 Max.YesYesYes
Blood oxygenNoYesNo
Blood pressureNoNoNo
Menstrual cycle trackingNoNoNo
Swim trackingYesYesYes
Under-water heart rate trackingNoNoNo
Preloaded mapsNoNoNo
On-screen workout modesNoNoNo
Triathlon modeNoNoNo
ECG TrackingNoNoNo
Preloaded sport modesYesYesYes
Safety trackingNoNoNo

MEDIA

AudioNoNoNo
Music streamingNoNoNo
Bluetooth musicNoNoNo
RadioNoNoNo
LoudspeakerNoNoNo
MicrophoneNoNoNo
CameraNoNoNo

SENSORS

AccelerometerYesYesYes
Barometer/AltimeterYesYesNo
Heart rate monitor (HRM)YesYesYes
CompassNoNoNo
Gyroscope NoNoYes
Ambient lightNoYesNo
Pulse Ox.NoYesNo
ECGNoNoNo
ThermometerNoNoNo
Other sensors------

PLATFORM

Operating system (OS)Proprietary OSProprietary OSFreeRTOS
Chipset----MCU Cortex M33F
CPU----96MHz
GPU----__

BATTERY

Type of batteryLithium polymerLithium polymerNon-removable Li-Polymer battery
Battery capacity ----120mAh
Battery lifeGPS mode: Up to 8 hours
Smartwatch mode: Up to 7 days
Smartwatch mode: Up to 7 daysStandby: 10 days+
Mixed usage: 5 days+
Charging typeCharging cableCharging cableWireless charging
Charging dock
Charging timeAbout 1-2 hrsAbout 1-2 hrsAbout 1-2 hours
Battery saver modeNoNoNo
Solar powerNoNoNo
Rapid chargingNoNo_

CLOCK FEATURES

Time/DateYesYesYes
StopwatchYesYesYes
AlarmYesYesYes

OTHER FUNCTIONS

Control cameraNoNoYes
Music controlYesYesYes
Find phoneYesYesYes
Text responseNoNoYes (preset replies)

MISC

Payment systemNoNoNo
Compatibility Android and iOS
Check if your device is compatible
Android and iOS
Check if your device is compatible
Android 5.0+ RAM 1.5GB+
iPhone: iPhone 7+, iOS 10.0+
Companion appGarmin connect IQ storeGarmin connect IQ storeSamsung Gear app
Customizable watch face____No
Interchangeable band YesYesNo
Voice commandNoNoNo

BOX CONTENTS

Garmin VivosportGarmin VivosmartSamsung Galaxy Fit
(SM-R370)
StrapsStrapsStraps
Charging cableCharging cableWireless charging
Charging dock
Quick start guideQuick start guideQuick start guide
NOTE: We can't guarantee that all the information on this table are 100% correct. Read full disclaimer. Please, report an error.
Official SiteOfficial Site





Official Site

Garmin Vivosport vs Vivosmart 4 vs Samsung Galaxy fit Features Compared

The Differences

  1. Design

  2. Well, each of these smartbands has got a decent appearance, sleek and lightweight which are attributes of a smartband that makes this type of wearables the most befitting choices to wear while working out.

    However, merely looking at these three, you’d agree with me that the Galaxy Fit has the most stylish design. The Galaxy Fit also has the largest display that ensures you can see more at a glance, and the AMOLED powering the display offers a more interactive display that’s more lively than the OLED on Vivosmart 4 and transflective memory-in-pixel of the Vivosport. Although, the transflective LCD display of the Vivosport makes the display easier to read outdoors than the other two.

    In addition, the Galaxy Fit also has a certified MIL-STD-810G – US military grade rating that ensures it can withstand to a great extent extreme weather conditions that off course makes it a more durable device.
    Although, the Vivosmart 4 has the least weight, while also being the slimmest.

  3. Fitness Tracking

  4. Each of these three can track your steps, distance, sleep, calories, and sedentary reminder that remind you to move after a long period of inactivity.

    However, the Vivosport comes with inbuilt GPS which makes it a great choice for outdoor activities tracking, while the Vivosmart 4 comes with a pulse ox sensor that monitors blood oxygen level. This feature comes handy for climbers as it helps you see how well your body is adjusting to higher heights, thus helping you know when it’s not safe to continue climbing, while also being able to monitor how well your body utilizes oxygen while you sleep, giving you more insight into your sleep quality.

    On the other hand, the Galaxy Fit offers about 90 different preloaded activity profiles which are more preloaded sport modes than what you can get from either the Vivosport or Vivosmart 4. A great choice for indoor exercise tracking.

  5. Battery Life


With any of these three you’ll get about a week of battery life which is quiet awesome. Although, while both the Vivosport and Vivosmart 4 will give you about a week of battery life, the Galaxy Fit falls behind a bit, no thanks to the AMOLED display.

Which Should You Buy?

With any of these three you’ve got a fitness tracker that will help you manage your fitness goals efficiently and effortlessly.

However, the Galaxy Fit offers more activity profiles, about 90 and is able to auto-detect and track a good number of those, while not forgetting that it also has an NFC chip that allows you access to Samsung Pay – a contactless payment system that lets you make a payment from this device on the go.

It also features quick reply preset messages that allow you to reply to text messages. This feature is also present on the Vivosmart 4.

On the other hand, the Vivosport with inbuilt GPS is a great choice for outdoor activity tracking, while the Vivosmart 4 with barometric altimeter and pulse ox is the best choice for climbers.

Here’s how they stack up;

SAMSUNG GALAXY FIT Has the most outstanding design, while also being a comprehensive activity tracker with support for 90 sport modes and an impressive long battery life that lets you go long on a single charge. The best choice for indoor exercise tracking.
GARMIN VIVOSMART 4 Also a great choice, and the best choice for climbers.
GARMIN VIVOSPORT Another nice choice, and the best choice for tracking outdoor activities.

Our Pick

The Galaxy Fit has the most stylish design that leaves it with the most decent apperance, while also being a comprehensive activity tracker with about 90 different sport modes to choose from, and a long battery life that lets you go about a week on a single charge. The Samsung Galaxy Fit is our preferred choice.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top