amazfit bip vs fitbit charge 3 vs huawei fit

Compare Amazfit Bip vs Fitbit Charge 3 vs Huawei Fit

Like this post? Please share it...

Last Updated on

In this comparison are activity trackers with flexible and attractive designs. We compare Amazfit Bip vs Fitbit Charge 3 vs Huawei Fit – All great choices for fitness tracking and low-priced too. We compare specs and features head-to-head to find the difference among these three to help you make a wiser decision.

Amazfit Bip vs Fitbit Charge 3 vs Huawei Fit – Specifications

 Amazfit BipFitbit Charge 3Huawei Fit
amazfit bipfitbit-charge 3 specshuawei fit specs

EDITOR'S RATING

Design:
4 out of 5 stars (4.0 / 5)
Battery:
4.7 out of 5 stars (4.7 / 5)
Fitness tracking:
3.9 out of 5 stars (3.9 / 5)
Features:
3.3 out of 5 stars (3.3 / 5)
Price:
4.5 out of 5 stars (4.5 / 5)
Average:
4.1 out of 5 stars (4.1 / 5)

Design:
4.3 out of 5 stars (4.3 / 5)
Battery:
4 out of 5 stars (4.0 / 5)
Fitness tracking:
4.5 out of 5 stars (4.5 / 5)
Features:
4 out of 5 stars (4.0 / 5)
Price:
3 out of 5 stars (3.0 / 5)
Average:
4 out of 5 stars (4.0 / 5)
Design:
4.1 out of 5 stars (4.1 / 5)
Battery:
4.2 out of 5 stars (4.2 / 5)
Fitness tracking:
4.2 out of 5 stars (4.2 / 5)
Features:
3.2 out of 5 stars (3.2 / 5)
Price:
3.8 out of 5 stars (3.8 / 5)
Average:
3.9 out of 5 stars (3.9 / 5)

WHERE TO BUY

View @ Amazon<strong>Check @ Amazon</strong> Check @ Amazon<strong>See @ Amazon</strong> See @ Amazon

ABOUT DEVICE

Device nameAmazfit BipFitbit Charge 3Huawei Fit
Device typeSport/Fitness smartwatchSporty/Fitness smartwatchFitness smartwatch
Predessesor--Fitbit Charge 2_
Successor--Fitbit Charge 4_
Released dateAugust, 2017August, 2018November, 2016
Ideal forUnisexUnisexUnisex

DISPLAY

Display typeTransflect LCD (Colored)OLED (monochrome)LCD (monochrome)
Display size1.28 inch1.57 inch1.04 inch
Display resolution178 x 178 pixels__208 x 208 pixel
Pixel density----_
Input typeTouchscreen,
1 physical button
TouchscreenTouchscreen
Always-onYesNoYes

BODY

ShapeRectangular/curvedRectangular/curvedCircular
Dimension39.4 x 34.1 x 9.5 mm38 x 18.3 x 11.8 mm39.4 x 39.4 x 11.2mm
Weight31g30 grams35grams
Casing materialPolycarbonatePlastic ResinAluminum
Strap/band materialSiliconePolyester (Special edition)
Silicone
Silicone
Bezel MaterialGlass (bezeless)ResinCeramics
Strap size20 mm140 - 180 mm (small)
180 - 220 mm (large)
20mm
Screen protectionCorning Gorilla glass 3Hardened GlassCorning Gorilla Glass
Water resistant/ProtectionYes, IP68Yes, 5ATMYes, 5ATM
Swim-proofNot recommendedYes, recommendedYes, recommended
Color(s)White
Green
Red
Black
Graphite black
Rose-gold/berry
Rose-gold/ blue grey

(Special Edition)
Lavender
White
Black
Orange
Gray
Blue

MEMORY

RAM----__
Internal storage--____
Memory card slotNo__No

CONNECTIVITY

BluetoothBluetooth v4.0Bluetooth v4.0 LEBluetooth v4.2 LE
Bluetooth callingNoNoNo
Wi-FiNoNoNo
NFCNoYes (special edition)No
GPSYes, GPS/GLONASSNo, (connected GPS)No (connected GPS)

CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY

TechnologyNoneNoNo
SIMNoneNoNo
BandNoNoNo

NOTIFICATIONS

Email alertYesYesYes
SMS alertYesYesYes
Calls alertYesYesYes
Event reminderYesYesYes
WeatherYesYesYes
Third-party appsYesYesYes

FITNESS TRACKING

Sleep apneaNoNoNo
Sleep trackingYesYesYes
StepsYesYesYes
Floors climbedNoYesYes
Heart rate monitoringYesYesYes
CaloriesYesYesYes
DistanceYesYesYes
StressNoYes__
VO2 Max.NoYesYes
Blood oxygenNoYesNo
Blood pressureNoNoNo
Menstrual cycle trackingNoYesNo
Swim trackingYesYesYes
Under-water heart rate trackingNoNoNo
Preloaded mapsNoNoNo
On-screen workout modesNoNoNo
Triathlon modeNo__Yes
ECG TrackingNoNoNo
Preloaded sport modesYes, 4Yes, 15+Yes
Safety trackingNoNoNo

MEDIA

AudioNoNoNo
Music streamingNoNoNo
Bluetooth musicNoNoNo
RadioNoNoNo
LoudspeakerNoNoNo
MicrophoneNoNoNo
CameraNoNoNo

SENSORS

AccelerometerYesYesYes
Barometer/AltimeterNoYesNo
Heart rate monitor (HRM)YesYesYes
CompassYesNoNo
Gyroscope No__Yes
Ambient lightYesNoYes
Pulse Ox.NoYesNo
ECGNoNoNo
ThermometerNoNoNo
Other sensors--__--

PLATFORM

Operating system (OS)Proprietary OSFitbit OSProprietary OS
Chipset------
CPU------
GPU------

BATTERY

Type of batteryNon-removable Li-Polymer batteryNon-removable lithium polymerNon-removable Li-ion
Battery capacity 190 mAh_80mAh
Battery lifeStandby: 90days
Mixed Usage: 40 days+
GPS tracking: 20 hrs+
Mixed usage: up to 7 daysStandby:10 days+
Mixed usage: 5 days+
Charging type2-pins POGO pinUSB based charging dockCharging dock
Charging timeAbout 2-3 hoursAbout 1-2 hoursAbout 1-2 hours
Battery saver modeNoNoNo
Solar powerNoNoNo
Rapid charging_NoNo

CLOCK FEATURES

Time/DateYesYesYes
StopwatchYesYesYes
AlarmYesYesYes

OTHER FUNCTIONS

Control cameraYesNo_
Music controlYesNoYes
Find phoneYesNoYes
Text responseNoYes (android only)_

MISC

Payment systemNoneFitbit Pay (special edition)Yes
Compatibility Android 4.0+
iOS 8.0+
Android, IOS

Check supported devices
Android 4.4+
iOS 8.0+
Companion appMi Fit AppFitbit AppHuawei wear app
Customizable watch faceYesYesYes
Interchangeable band Yes, 20mmYesYes, 20mm
Voice commandNoNoNo

BOX CONTENTS

Amazfit BipFitbit Charge 3Huawei Fit
StrapsStrap (small and large)Straps
ChargerMagnetic charging dockCharging Dock and USB cable
Quick start guideQuick start guideQuick start guide
NOTE: We can't guarantee that all the information on this table are 100% correct. Read full disclaimer. Please, report an error.
Official SiteOfficial SiteOfficial Site

Amazfit Bip vs Fitbit Charge 3 vs Huawei Fit Features Compared

  1. Design and Display
  2. One common feature amongst these three is that each is fitness-focused and lightweight. Looking at the display technology on each of these three, it’s obvious that the Fitbit Charge 3 which uses OLED has a much lively display compared to the reflective LCD display of the Bip and the monochromic-colored LCD display of Huawei Fit which however has the most easily readable screen outdoors.

    On the other hand, all three devices look outstanding in their respective ways, however, the Bip seems to be more versatile. It’s the kind of watch you could wear to the gym, nice casual wear or perhaps to the office. It’s also the slimmest among these three, while the Charge 3 looks more like a fitness tracker (Although no surprises, it’s just in line with the manufacturer’s intent.) While it’s a perfect fit for the gym, I don’t think I would be wearing it out to an official event.

    The Huawei Fit looks more like a classic watch even though it was released as a fitness smartwatch. It’s a great fit for the office, but certainly not the best fit for the gym among these three. Charge 3 is the best for the gym, it is also the lightest in weight.

  3. Battery Life
  4. In terms of battery life, the Amazfit Bip has the longest battery life. Perhaps the major reason it’s a popular demand among consumers. The battery life of the Amazfit Bip lasts far longer than the other two. On regular usage, you should get about 12 days or more compared to the Huawei Fit which will give you about 4 days or more, while Charge 3 has the least battery life of about 2 days which is still great and should see you through even in extreme workout sessions. That’s the price to pay for that richer display.

  5. Waterproof Rating/Protection
  6. While both Fitbit Charge 3 and Huawei Fit are rated 5ATM making these two water-resistant up to 50 meters, the Amazfit Bip is rated IP68 and is only water-resistant up to 1.5 meters. As such, both the Fitbit Charge 3 and Huawei Fit are swim-proof. You can wear any of those two to the pool or ocean, but not the Bip.

  7. Fitness Tracking


Each of these three smartwatches is fitness-focused. Each comes with an accelerometer, gyroscope, and HRM ready to track your active life. However, the Fitbit Charge 3 has more fitness tracking features inbuilt and certainly the best fit to wear to the gym.

On the other hand, there is an inbuilt GPS in the Bip which is lacking in both the Charge 3 and Huawei Fit which makes the Bip a better choice for tracking your locations, routes, and distances. Although you can still access GPS functions with the Charge 3 or Huawei Fit, that could be quiet inconvenient in certain situations.

Which Should You Buy?

Any of these three will make a great choice for fitness tracking. However the Fitbit Charge 3 is the best choice for fitness tracking among these three. Its more advanced, very light, comes with NFC chip in special edition and is clearly the best fit for the gym. It’s a great choice for men, women and fitness enthusiasts alike.

The Huawei Fit which is $70 cheaper than Charge 3 is also a great choice for fitness tracking and with a classic design means you can wear this out to the office and it will look just great. It’s a nice fit for women.

The Amazfit Bip with a casual design is the most versatile among these three, it doesn’t have all the premium touches, but it’s a nicer fit for more occasions than the other two. It’s also cheaper than Charge 3, has a simple yet stylish design and in addition the monster battery life that lets you go longer on a single charge. It’s the best choice among these three, a great bargain for both men and women.

Here is a summary;

AMAZFIT BIP Gives the best value for money, casual design plus a tested and confirmed monster battery life.
Fitbit Charge 3 Stylish design, lightweight, rich display and enormous fitness tracking features. The best choice for fitness tracking.
HUAWEI FIT Also a great choice, a smart alternative to the Bip or Charge 3.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top